All three courses of action (I, II, and III) are reasonable and logically follow from the school's decision to provide free breakfast. Let's break down why:

(I) The school will have to admit many poor students who will seek admission for the next academic year. Offering free breakfast, especially without government funding, is a significant incentive for families struggling financially. It's logical to expect an increase in applications from economically disadvantaged students. This course of action acknowledges that potential increase and the need to prepare for it.
(II) The canteen facilities and utensils have to be checked and new purchases to be made to equip it properly. Providing breakfast to all primary students will significantly increase the canteen's workload. It's essential to assess the current facilities, identify any shortcomings, and make necessary upgrades or purchases (utensils, cooking equipment, serving areas, etc.) to handle the increased demand efficiently and hygienically.
(III) Funds will have to be raised to support the scheme for years to come. The statement explicitly mentions the absence of government grants. This means the school will need to find alternative funding sources to sustain the free breakfast program. This course of action highlights the critical need for fundraising efforts (donations, sponsorships, etc.) to ensure the long-term viability of the initiative.

All three courses of action (I, II, and III) are reasonable and logically follow from the school's decision to provide free breakfast. Let's break down why:

(I) The school will have to admit many poor students who will seek admission for the next academic year. Offering free breakfast, especially without government funding, is a significant incentive for families struggling financially. It's logical to expect an increase in applications from economically disadvantaged students. This course of action acknowledges that potential increase and the need to prepare for it.
(II) The canteen facilities and utensils have to be checked and new purchases to be made to equip it properly. Providing breakfast to all primary students will significantly increase the canteen's workload. It's essential to assess the current facilities, identify any shortcomings, and make necessary upgrades or purchases (utensils, cooking equipment, serving areas, etc.) to handle the increased demand efficiently and hygienically.
(III) Funds will have to be raised to support the scheme for years to come. The statement explicitly mentions the absence of government grants. This means the school will need to find alternative funding sources to sustain the free breakfast program. This course of action highlights the critical need for fundraising efforts (donations, sponsorships, etc.) to ensure the long-term viability of the initiative.

All three courses of action (I, II, and III) are reasonable and logically follow from the school's decision to provide free breakfast. Let's break down why:

(I) The school will have to admit many poor students who will seek admission for the next academic year. Offering free breakfast, especially without government funding, is a significant incentive for families struggling financially. It's logical to expect an increase in applications from economically disadvantaged students. This course of action acknowledges that potential increase and the need to prepare for it.
(II) The canteen facilities and utensils have to be checked and new purchases to be made to equip it properly. Providing breakfast to all primary students will significantly increase the canteen's workload. It's essential to assess the current facilities, identify any shortcomings, and make necessary upgrades or purchases (utensils, cooking equipment, serving areas, etc.) to handle the increased demand efficiently and hygienically.
(III) Funds will have to be raised to support the scheme for years to come. The statement explicitly mentions the absence of government grants. This means the school will need to find alternative funding sources to sustain the free breakfast program. This course of action highlights the critical need for fundraising efforts (donations, sponsorships, etc.) to ensure the long-term viability of the initiative.

All three courses of action (I, II, and III) are reasonable and logically follow from the school's decision to provide free breakfast. Let's break down why:

(I) The school will have to admit many poor students who will seek admission for the next academic year. Offering free breakfast, especially without government funding, is a significant incentive for families struggling financially. It's logical to expect an increase in applications from economically disadvantaged students. This course of action acknowledges that potential increase and the need to prepare for it.
(II) The canteen facilities and utensils have to be checked and new purchases to be made to equip it properly. Providing breakfast to all primary students will significantly increase the canteen's workload. It's essential to assess the current facilities, identify any shortcomings, and make necessary upgrades or purchases (utensils, cooking equipment, serving areas, etc.) to handle the increased demand efficiently and hygienically.
(III) Funds will have to be raised to support the scheme for years to come. The statement explicitly mentions the absence of government grants. This means the school will need to find alternative funding sources to sustain the free breakfast program. This course of action highlights the critical need for fundraising efforts (donations, sponsorships, etc.) to ensure the long-term viability of the initiative.

All three courses of action (I, II, and III) are reasonable and logically follow from the school's decision to provide free breakfast. Let's break down why:

(I) The school will have to admit many poor students who will seek admission for the next academic year. Offering free breakfast, especially without government funding, is a significant incentive for families struggling financially. It's logical to expect an increase in applications from economically disadvantaged students. This course of action acknowledges that potential increase and the need to prepare for it.
(II) The canteen facilities and utensils have to be checked and new purchases to be made to equip it properly. Providing breakfast to all primary students will significantly increase the canteen's workload. It's essential to assess the current facilities, identify any shortcomings, and make necessary upgrades or purchases (utensils, cooking equipment, serving areas, etc.) to handle the increased demand efficiently and hygienically.
(III) Funds will have to be raised to support the scheme for years to come. The statement explicitly mentions the absence of government grants. This means the school will need to find alternative funding sources to sustain the free breakfast program. This course of action highlights the critical need for fundraising efforts (donations, sponsorships, etc.) to ensure the long-term viability of the initiative.