mMCQ.

Navigation Menu

Step into mMCQ.

Launch mMCQ. diagnostic

Explore mMCQ.

MDCAT prepFree DiagnosticPricing & SubscribeSign in

Resources

Terms & Conditions

mMCQ.

© 2021 - 2025 mMCQ.All rights reserved.

WhatsApp
A Levels Biology (9700)•9700/12/O/N/24
Question 12 from 9700/12/O/N/24

Explanation

Non-competitive inhibition reduces Vmax without changing Km

Steps:

  • Identify non-competitive inhibition: binds allosteric site, decreases enzyme activity regardless of substrate binding.
  • Recall Michaelis-Menten effect: curve reaches lower maximum velocity, but Km (substrate for half Vmax) stays same.
  • Compare to uninhibited: inhibited line plateaus lower, crosses half its Vmax at original Km.
  • Rule out alternatives: competitive raises Km (same Vmax); uncompetitive lowers both; no change is uninhibited.

Why D is correct:

  • D shows curve with unchanged Km but reduced Vmax, matching non-competitive definition where inhibitor affects catalysis, not substrate binding (V = Vmax [S] / (Km + [S]), Vmax lowered by factor (1 + [I]/Ki)).

Why the others are wrong:

  • A: Depicts competitive inhibition (higher Km, same Vmax).
  • B: Shows uncompetitive inhibition (parallel lines in Lineweaver-Burk, lowers both Km and Vmax).
  • C: Represents no inhibition (unchanged curve).

Final answer: D

Topic: Factors that affect enzyme action

Practice more A Levels Biology (9700) questions on mMCQ.me