mMCQ.

Navigation Menu

Step into mMCQ.

Launch mMCQ. diagnostic

Explore mMCQ.

MDCAT prepFree DiagnosticPricing & SubscribeSign in

Resources

Terms & Conditions

mMCQ.

© 2021 - 2025 mMCQ.All rights reserved.

WhatsApp
A Levels Biology (9700)•9700/13/O/N/18
Question 13 from 9700/13/O/N/18

Explanation

Enzyme Inhibition Kinetics

Steps:

  • Recall competitive inhibitors bind active site, competing with substrate, increasing Km but Vmax unchanged.
  • Recall non-competitive inhibitors bind allosteric site, reducing enzyme activity, decreasing Vmax but Km unchanged.
  • Evaluate choices against these effects on Km and Vmax.
  • Identify D matches standard kinetic impacts.

Why D is correct:

  • In Michaelis-Menten kinetics, competitive inhibition raises Km (apparent affinity decreases) without affecting Vmax, while non-competitive lowers Vmax by reducing effective enzyme concentration.

Why the others are wrong:

  • A: Reverses binding sites—competitive bind active site, non-competitive bind allosteric.
  • B: Oversimplifies shapes; competitive mimic substrate for binding, but non-competitive shapes vary without mimicking.
  • C: Inaccurate; competitive typically mimic substrate shape, non-competitive can have varied shapes for allosteric binding.

Final answer: D

Topic: Mode of action of enzymes

Practice more A Levels Biology (9700) questions on mMCQ.me